CPAP Machine Lawsuit (Philips Respironics)
Philips recalled millions of CPAP devices due to toxic foam degradation that exposed users to carcinogenic particles.
Last updated: 2026-03-01
What Is the CPAP Machine Lawsuit About?
The CPAP machine lawsuit involves claims against Philips Respironics and its parent company Koninklijke Philips N.V. arising from a massive recall of approximately 3 to 4 million CPAP, BiPAP, and mechanical ventilator devices. The recall, announced on June 14, 2021, was triggered by the discovery that a polyester-based polyurethane (PE-PUR) sound abatement foam used in these devices could degrade and release potentially toxic particles and gases that users inhaled during sleep therapy.
The federal lawsuits are consolidated in MDL 3014 in the Western District of Pennsylvania. The FDA classified this as a Class I recall — the most serious category — indicating that the devices posed a risk of serious injury or death. In April 2024, Philips agreed to a $1.1 billion settlement to resolve personal injury claims.
Plaintiffs allege that Philips knew about the foam degradation issue for years before the recall and failed to act. The PE-PUR foam was used for sound dampening in the devices, but it broke down over time — particularly when exposed to heat, humidity, or ozone-based cleaning products — releasing black particles and harmful chemical off-gasses directly into the airway of users. For another medical device lawsuit, see our Bard PowerPort lawsuit page.
Recalled Devices and Models
The recall covers a wide range of Philips Respironics devices manufactured before April 26, 2021. It is important to note that the DreamStation 2, released after the recall, does not contain the problematic PE-PUR foam and is not part of the recall.
Philips Respironics Devices: Recall Status
DreamStation CPAP
by Philips Respironics
First generation — RECALLED
DreamStation Auto CPAP
by Philips Respironics
Auto-adjusting model — RECALLED
DreamStation BiPAP
by Philips Respironics
BiLevel models — RECALLED
DreamStation Go
by Philips Respironics
Travel CPAP — RECALLED
System One (60 Series)
by Philips Respironics
Older CPAP/BiPAP models — RECALLED
REMstar SE Auto
by Philips Respironics
CPAP device — RECALLED
Dorma 400/500
by Philips Respironics
CPAP devices — RECALLED
Trilogy 100/200 Ventilator
by Philips Respironics
Life-support ventilator — RECALLED
A-Series BiPAP
by Philips Respironics
Various BiPAP models — RECALLED
DreamStation 2
by Philips Respironics
NOT RECALLED — does not contain PE-PUR foam
If you are unsure whether your device is part of the recall, check the model and serial number on the Philips recall website or contact an attorney who can help verify your device status.
Health Risks from PE-PUR Foam Degradation
When the PE-PUR sound abatement foam degrades, users may be exposed to two types of hazards: (1) inhaling or ingesting small black foam particles, and (2) breathing in volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and other chemical off-gasses released by the degrading foam. The risk of degradation increases with device age, heat, humidity, and use of ozone-based cleaning products.
Reported health effects from exposure to degraded PE-PUR foam include:
- Cancer: Including lung cancer, nasal cancer, throat cancer, and liver cancer, linked to inhalation of carcinogenic chemicals released by the degrading foam.
- Respiratory issues: Coughing, difficulty breathing, wheezing, chest tightness, new or worsening asthma, and upper airway irritation.
- Headaches and dizziness: Persistent headaches, lightheadedness, and sinus pressure, particularly upon waking after device use.
- Organ damage: Kidney and liver damage from systemic exposure to toxic compounds, including diethylene glycol and toluene diisocyanate.
- Nausea and skin irritation: Gastrointestinal symptoms and skin reactions from foam particle exposure.
Used a Recalled Philips CPAP or BiPAP Device?
You may be entitled to compensation. Get a free case evaluation from an experienced mass tort attorney — no upfront costs.
Who Qualifies for the CPAP Lawsuit?
Eligibility for the CPAP lawsuit depends on several factors related to your device use and any health effects you experienced. The following criteria are generally used to evaluate potential claims:
Do You Qualify for the CPAP Lawsuit?
You may be eligible if you meet the following criteria. Consult an attorney for a personalized evaluation.
- You used a Philips Respironics CPAP, BiPAP, or ventilator device that is part of the June 2021 recall
- Your device was manufactured before April 26, 2021
- You used the recalled device for a period of at least several months
- You developed cancer (lung, nasal, throat, liver, or other types) after using the device
- You experienced respiratory problems such as chronic cough, asthma, or breathing difficulty
- You developed kidney or liver damage or other organ-related health issues
- You experienced persistent headaches, sinus issues, or other symptoms during use
- You are within the applicable statute of limitations for your state
Lawsuit Timeline
The CPAP lawsuit has progressed rapidly since the recall announcement, culminating in a $1.1 billion settlement in 2024. Here are the key dates:
Lawsuit Timeline
Devices Sold to Millions of Users
Philips Respironics manufactures and sells millions of CPAP, BiPAP, and mechanical ventilator devices containing PE-PUR sound abatement foam.
Philips Acknowledges Foam Issue
Philips first publicly acknowledges potential health risks from the polyester-based polyurethane (PE-PUR) sound abatement foam in its devices.
Massive Recall Announced
Philips issues a voluntary recall of approximately 3 to 4 million CPAP, BiPAP, and mechanical ventilator devices worldwide due to PE-PUR foam degradation.
FDA Classifies as Class I Recall
The FDA classifies the Philips recall as Class I — the most serious type — indicating the devices may cause serious injury or death.
MDL 3014 Established
Federal cases consolidated into MDL 3014 in the Western District of Pennsylvania for coordinated pretrial proceedings.
Discovery and Litigation Proceed
Thousands of personal injury and medical monitoring lawsuits filed. Discovery reveals internal Philips documents about foam degradation knowledge.
$1.1 Billion Personal Injury Settlement
Philips agrees to a $1.1 billion settlement to resolve personal injury claims from users of recalled devices.
Settlement Claims Processing
Settlement claims process underway for eligible claimants. Individual claim values depend on injury type and severity.
Settlement Amounts
In April 2024, Philips agreed to a $1.1 billion settlement to resolve personal injury claims related to the recalled CPAP devices. This settlement is separate from the economic loss class action settlement that addressed device replacement costs. Individual payouts from the personal injury settlement are based on a tier system that considers the type and severity of the claimant's health effects.
Estimated Settlement Ranges
These ranges are estimates based on publicly available settlement data and comparable cases. Individual results vary significantly.
It is important to note that these are estimated ranges based on publicly available information about the settlement structure. Your actual compensation will depend on the specifics of your claim, including your diagnosis, the duration of device use, medical documentation, and other factors. For a general explanation of how mass tort settlement amounts work, see our mass tort settlement amounts guide.
How to File a CPAP Lawsuit Claim
If you used a recalled Philips CPAP, BiPAP, or ventilator and experienced health problems, here is the process for filing a claim:
How to File a CPAP Lawsuit Claim
Free Case Evaluation
Contact an attorney for a free review of your recalled device use and any health issues you have experienced.
Verify Your Device
Confirm that your CPAP, BiPAP, or ventilator is among the recalled Philips models and document your device information (model, serial number).
Document Health Effects
Gather medical records documenting any health conditions that developed during or after use of the recalled device.
File Your Claim
Your attorney files your claim as part of the MDL 3014 proceedings or the settlement claims process, depending on timing.
Claims Review
Your claim is reviewed and evaluated based on device usage, health impact, and supporting medical documentation.
Compensation
Receive compensation based on the tier and severity of your claim. Attorneys work on contingency — no payment unless you win.
For more on the general mass tort filing process, read our guide on how to join a mass tort lawsuit. You can also learn about how mass tort attorneys get paid through contingency fees.
Named Defendants
The CPAP lawsuit names the following defendants:
- Philips Respironics, Inc. — The Philips subsidiary that designed, manufactured, and sold the recalled CPAP, BiPAP, and ventilator devices. Headquartered in Murrysville, Pennsylvania.
- Koninklijke Philips N.V. — The Dutch parent company of Philips Respironics. Plaintiffs allege the parent company had oversight responsibilities and knowledge of the foam degradation issue.
Plaintiffs allege that Philips received complaints about black particles and foam degradation as early as 2015 but did not issue the recall until June 2021. Internal documents obtained during discovery suggest the company was aware of the potential risks for years before acting. For another case involving a medical device manufacturer's alleged concealment of product risks, see our hernia mesh lawsuit page.
Medical and Scientific Evidence
The scientific basis for the CPAP lawsuit rests on both the known toxicity of the chemicals released by degrading PE-PUR foam and the reported health outcomes of device users:
- Philips testing results: Philips's own testing confirmed that the PE-PUR foam could degrade and release harmful compounds. The company identified formaldehyde, toluene diisocyanate (TDI), and diethylene glycol among the chemical off-gasses.
- FDA analysis: The FDA's independent testing found elevated levels of certain volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in recalled devices. The agency received over 100,000 medical device reports related to the recall.
- Known carcinogenic compounds: Formaldehyde is classified as a Group 1 carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). Toluene diisocyanate is a known respiratory sensitizer and suspected carcinogen.
- Adverse event reports: Thousands of CPAP users reported new health problems, including cancers, respiratory conditions, and organ damage, to the FDA's MedWatch adverse event reporting system.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which CPAP machines are included in the Philips recall?
What is the PE-PUR foam and why is it dangerous?
What is the $1.1 billion CPAP settlement?
Can I still file a CPAP lawsuit claim?
What health problems are linked to recalled CPAP machines?
Do I have to stop using my CPAP if it is recalled?
Is the DreamStation 2 part of the recall?
How much compensation can I receive from the CPAP lawsuit?
Legal Disclaimer
This is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. It does not create an attorney-client relationship. The information presented may not reflect the most current legal developments. Consult a qualified attorney in your jurisdiction for advice about your specific situation.
Free Case Review — See If You Qualify
No obligation. No upfront costs. Attorneys work on contingency — you pay nothing unless you win.
Related Lawsuits
3M Earplugs Lawsuit
The largest MDL in US history — 3M's defective Combat Arms Earplugs caused hearing loss and tinnitus in over 300,000 military service members. $6.01 billion settlement.
NEC Formula Lawsuit
Cow's milk-based infant formulas given to premature babies have been linked to necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), a life-threatening intestinal disease.
Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit
Major baby food brands sold products with dangerously high levels of arsenic, lead, cadmium, and mercury, linked to neurological harm in children.