Active

Talcum Powder Lawsuit (Johnson & Johnson)

Johnson & Johnson talc-based baby powder has been linked to ovarian cancer and mesothelioma. J&J proposed an $8.9B settlement fund.

Last updated: 2026-02-25

What Is This Lawsuit About?

The talcum powder lawsuit is one of the highest-profile consumer product liability cases in American legal history. Tens of thousands of women allege that Johnson & Johnson (J&J), the world's largest consumer health products company, knew for decades that its talc-based Johnson's Baby Powder and Shower to Shower body powder could cause ovarian cancer when applied to the genital area — and failed to warn consumers.

A separate but related set of claims alleges that J&J's talc products were contaminated with asbestos, a known carcinogen, causing mesothelioma (a rare and deadly cancer of the lining of the lungs, abdomen, or heart). A landmark 2018 Reuters investigation revealed that J&J's own internal testing had detected asbestos in its talc supply as far back as the 1970s, and that the company had engaged in a decades-long effort to suppress and discredit unfavorable research.

Jury verdicts in talcum powder trials have been dramatic, including a $4.69 billion verdict in 2018 (later reduced to $2.12 billion) for 22 women with ovarian cancer. J&J discontinued its talc-based baby powder in North America in 2020 and globally in 2023, replacing it with a cornstarch-based formula.

The litigation is consolidated in MDL 2738 in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. As of 2025, J&J has proposed an $8.9 billion settlement fund through its subsidiary LTL Management's bankruptcy restructuring process to resolve the majority of ovarian cancer claims. The settlement requires approval from at least 75% of claimants and the bankruptcy court.

Johnson & Johnson Talcum Powder Settlement Journey

2016 First Major Verdict $72M Fox case 2018 $4.69B Verdict (reduced to $2.12B) 22 women with ovarian cancer 2020 Talc Discontinued in North America 2023 Global Talc End Worldwide switch to cornstarch 2024-25 $8.9B Settlement Proposed Via LTL Management bankruptcy process Over 100,000 talcum powder claims filed against J&J

Who Qualifies?

The talcum powder lawsuit primarily involves women who used talc-based body powder products in the genital area as part of their personal hygiene routine and were later diagnosed with ovarian cancer. The longer and more frequently talcum powder was used, the stronger the potential claim. However, there is no established minimum duration requirement — individual cases are evaluated on their own merits.

A second group of eligible claimants includes individuals (both men and women) who developed mesothelioma after exposure to asbestos-contaminated talc products. These claims are particularly strong because asbestos is a known human carcinogen with an established causal link to mesothelioma. For more on asbestos-related claims, see the asbestos/mesothelioma lawsuit page.

Do You Qualify for the Talcum Powder Lawsuit?

You may be eligible to file a claim if the following apply to you:

  • Regular use of talcum powder products in the genital area for personal hygiene
  • Diagnosed with ovarian cancer (any type) after a history of talc product use
  • Diagnosed with mesothelioma after exposure to talc products (asbestos contamination)
  • Long-term use (multiple years) of Johnson's Baby Powder, Shower to Shower, or similar talc products
  • Family members of deceased women who used talcum powder and died from ovarian cancer
  • Both direct application and use on clothing, sanitary pads, or diaphragms may qualify
  • Use of talc-based products by partners that resulted in exposure also considered

Products Named in the Lawsuit

The litigation primarily focuses on talc-based body powder products manufactured by Johnson & Johnson, but other manufacturers' products are also implicated. If you used any of the following products regularly, particularly in the genital area, you may have been exposed to talc particles linked to ovarian cancer or asbestos-contaminated talc:

Products Named in This Lawsuit

Johnson's Baby Powder (Original)

by Johnson & Johnson

The most widely used talc-based body powder in the U.S. Discontinued in North America (2020) and globally (2023).

Shower to Shower Body Powder

by Johnson & Johnson (later sold to Valeant/Bausch)

Originally marketed by J&J as an "after shower" body powder with talc as the primary ingredient.

Johnson's Baby Powder (Aloe & Vitamin E)

by Johnson & Johnson

Scented variant of the classic baby powder, also containing talc.

Johnson's Medicated Baby Powder

by Johnson & Johnson

Medicated version with talc base, marketed for diaper rash prevention.

Cashmere Bouquet Body Powder

by Colgate-Palmolive

Talc-based body powder marketed primarily to women.

Old Spice Body Powder

by Procter & Gamble

Some formulations contained talc as a primary ingredient.

Gold Bond Body Powder (Original)

by Chattem/Sanofi

Some older formulations of Gold Bond contained talc. Current versions use cornstarch.

Note: This is not an exhaustive list. Many talc-based body powders, cosmetics, and personal care products contained talc as a primary ingredient. If you used a talc-containing product not listed here and have been diagnosed with ovarian cancer or mesothelioma, consult with an attorney about your potential claim.

Think You May Qualify?

Get a free, no-obligation case review from an experienced attorney. You pay nothing unless you win.

Check Your Eligibility — Free Review

Lawsuit Timeline

The talcum powder litigation has evolved over more than a decade, producing landmark jury verdicts, explosive corporate document revelations, and one of the largest proposed product liability settlements in history. The following timeline captures the key milestones:

Lawsuit Timeline

1971

First Research Published

Early scientific research identifies talc particles in ovarian tumors, raising the first concerns about a potential link between talcum powder use in the genital area and ovarian cancer.

1982

Epidemiological Study

Dr. Daniel Cramer of Harvard publishes a landmark study showing a statistically significant association between genital talc use and ovarian cancer risk.

2006

IARC Classification

The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classifies genital use of talc-based body powder as "possibly carcinogenic to humans" (Group 2B).

2013-2016

Major Lawsuits Filed

Thousands of women file lawsuits against Johnson & Johnson alleging that long-term use of talc-based baby powder caused their ovarian cancer.

Feb 2016

First Major Verdict

A St. Louis jury awards the family of Jacqueline Fox $72 million in damages after finding J&J liable for her ovarian cancer death linked to talcum powder use.

July 2018

$4.69 Billion Verdict

A St. Louis jury awards 22 women a combined $4.69 billion (later reduced to $2.12 billion) in the largest talcum powder verdict, finding J&J knew its talc contained asbestos.

Dec 2018

Reuters Investigation

Reuters publishes a major investigation revealing that J&J knew for decades that asbestos lurked in its baby powder, based on internal documents from 1971 to the early 2000s.

May 2020

J&J Discontinues Talc in North America

Johnson & Johnson announces it will stop selling talc-based baby powder in the United States and Canada, citing declining demand due to "misinformation."

Aug 2023

Global Talc Discontinuation

J&J discontinues talc-based baby powder worldwide, replacing it with a cornstarch-based formula globally.

2024-2025

$8.9 Billion Settlement Proposed

J&J proposes a comprehensive $8.9 billion settlement fund through its subsidiary LTL Management's bankruptcy restructuring to resolve the majority of talc claims. The settlement requires approval from at least 75% of claimants.

Settlement Amounts & Verdicts

The talcum powder litigation has produced some of the largest jury verdicts in product liability history and a proposed global settlement of historic proportions:

Key Talcum Powder Verdicts & Settlement

Major Talcum Powder Financial Milestones Fox Verdict (2016) $72M First major talc trial verdict Wrongful death — family of Jacqueline Fox (St. Louis) Later overturned on jurisdiction Ingham Verdict (2018) $4.69B Largest talc verdict ever 22 women with ovarian cancer (St. Louis, MO) Reduced to $2.12B on appeal Proposed Settlement $8.9B Global settlement proposal Via LTL Management bankruptcy (2024-2025) Requires 75%+ claimant approval

Individual compensation under the proposed $8.9 billion settlement would be determined by a points-based system that considers factors including the type and stage of cancer, duration and frequency of talcum powder use, age at diagnosis, and other medical and personal factors. While specific payment tiers have not been publicly finalized, legal analysts estimate that individual payouts could range from tens of thousands to several hundred thousand dollars.

For a deeper understanding of how settlement amounts are calculated in mass tort cases, see our guide on mass tort settlement amounts and how settlement funds are distributed.

Estimated Settlement Ranges

These ranges are estimates based on publicly available settlement data and comparable cases. Individual results vary significantly.

How to File a Talcum Powder Claim

The process for filing a talcum powder claim depends in part on the status of J&J's proposed global settlement. Whether your claim proceeds through the settlement process or as individual litigation, working with an experienced attorney is essential. Here is the general process:

How the Process Works

1

Assess Your Eligibility

Determine if you regularly used talcum powder products (especially in the genital area) and have been diagnosed with ovarian cancer, mesothelioma, or another qualifying condition.

2

Gather Documentation

Collect medical records showing your diagnosis, purchase receipts or proof of product use (if available), and a personal history of how long and how frequently you used talcum powder.

3

Consult an Experienced Attorney

Contact a talcum powder lawsuit attorney for a free case evaluation. These cases involve complex medical and scientific evidence. Most attorneys work on contingency — no fees unless you win.

4

File Your Claim

Your attorney will prepare and file your lawsuit. Depending on the status of the J&J settlement proposal, your case may be filed individually, as part of the MDL, or as a claim in the settlement process.

5

Case Development

Your legal team will build your case with medical expert testimony, product use history, and scientific evidence linking talcum powder to your condition.

6

Settlement or Trial

Your case may be resolved through the proposed $8.9B global settlement (if approved) or proceed to individual trial. Your attorney will advise on the best path forward for your situation.

Talcum powder attorneys typically work on a contingency fee basis, meaning you pay nothing upfront and only pay attorney fees if you receive compensation. Learn more about the overall litigation process in our guide on how to join a mass tort lawsuit.

Named Defendants

The primary defendant in the talcum powder litigation is Johnson & Johnson, the world's largest consumer health products company. However, additional companies involved in the talc supply chain and other talc product manufacturers are also named:

  • Johnson & Johnson — The primary defendant. Manufactured and sold Johnson's Baby Powder and Shower to Shower for decades. Internal documents revealed the company was aware of potential asbestos contamination and cancer risks as early as the 1970s but continued to market products as safe and pure.
  • Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. / LTL Management LLC — J&J subsidiary created to manage talc-related liabilities through bankruptcy proceedings. LTL Management filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy as part of J&J's strategy to resolve all talc claims through a single settlement.
  • Imerys Talc America — Major talc mining company that supplied raw talc to Johnson & Johnson for decades. Filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in 2019 due to talc litigation liability.
  • Colgate-Palmolive — Named in some claims related to its Cashmere Bouquet talc-based body powder product.

Scientific & Medical Evidence

The scientific case connecting talcum powder to cancer rests on two distinct bodies of evidence: research on talc particles and ovarian cancer, and evidence of asbestos contamination in talc products.

Talc and Ovarian Cancer Research

More than 20 epidemiological studies have examined the relationship between genital talc use and ovarian cancer. A 1982 study by Dr. Daniel Cramer at Harvard found a statistically significant increase in ovarian cancer risk with talc use. A 2003 meta-analysis combining 16 studies found a 33% increased risk. The 2016 Nurses' Health Study, following over 120,000 women, found a modest but statistically significant association. Researchers believe talc particles can travel through the reproductive tract to the ovaries, causing chronic inflammation that promotes tumor development.

IARC Classification

The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), part of the World Health Organization, classified genital use of talc-based body powder as "possibly carcinogenic to humans" (Group 2B) in 2006. IARC separately classifies talc containing asbestos as "carcinogenic to humans" (Group 1).

Asbestos Contamination Evidence

A 2018 Reuters investigation revealed that J&J's own internal testing found asbestos contamination in its talc supply from at least 1971 through the early 2000s, yet the company assured regulators and consumers that its products were asbestos-free. Additional testing by independent labs, the FDA, and plaintiffs' experts has also found asbestos fibers in J&J's Baby Powder products.

FDA Findings

In 2019 and 2020, the FDA found asbestos contamination in samples of Johnson's Baby Powder, leading to voluntary recalls of specific lots. These findings corroborated plaintiffs' claims that talc products could contain dangerous asbestos fibers from the mining process, as talc and asbestos deposits often occur in close geological proximity.

The connection between asbestos and mesothelioma is well-established in the medical literature and in decades of asbestos litigation. The talcum powder case adds a new dimension by demonstrating that everyday consumer products could be a previously unrecognized source of asbestos exposure. For context on similar product liability cases involving medical devices, see the hernia mesh lawsuit page.

Frequently Asked Questions

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the talcum powder lawsuit about?
The talcum powder lawsuit involves claims against Johnson & Johnson and other manufacturers alleging that talc-based body powder products, when used in the genital area over long periods, can cause ovarian cancer. Additionally, some claims allege that talc products were contaminated with asbestos, causing mesothelioma. Plaintiffs claim that J&J knew about these risks for decades based on internal research but failed to warn consumers.
Who qualifies for the talcum powder lawsuit?
Women who regularly used talcum powder products (particularly Johnson's Baby Powder or Shower to Shower) in the genital area and were subsequently diagnosed with ovarian cancer may qualify. Individuals diagnosed with mesothelioma after regular talc product use may also be eligible, as some claims allege asbestos contamination in talc. Family members of deceased victims can file wrongful death claims.
How much is the Johnson & Johnson talcum powder settlement?
Johnson & Johnson has proposed an $8.9 billion settlement fund to resolve the majority of talcum powder ovarian cancer claims through a restructured bankruptcy process via its subsidiary LTL Management. This settlement, if approved by at least 75% of claimants, would be paid out over 25 years. Individual payments would vary based on factors such as cancer type, duration of product use, and the strength of each claim. Previous individual trial verdicts have ranged from tens of millions to billions of dollars.
What is the connection between talcum powder and cancer?
The scientific evidence suggests two pathways: (1) Talc particles applied to the genital area can travel through the reproductive tract to the ovaries, causing chronic inflammation that may lead to ovarian cancer over time. (2) Asbestos contamination — talc is mined from the earth and can be naturally contaminated with asbestos fibers, which are a known human carcinogen linked to mesothelioma. Both pathways form the basis for different types of claims in the litigation.
Is there a deadline to file a talcum powder claim?
Statutes of limitations vary by state, typically ranging from 1 to 6 years from the date of diagnosis or discovery of the connection between talc use and cancer. If J&J's proposed global settlement is approved, there may be specific claim filing deadlines set by the settlement administrator. It is critical to consult an attorney as soon as possible to understand the deadlines that apply to your case. See our statute of limitations guide for more information.
Does J&J still sell talcum powder?
Johnson & Johnson discontinued its talc-based Baby Powder in North America in May 2020 and globally in August 2023. The company now sells a cornstarch-based version of Baby Powder. However, the lawsuits are based on historical use of talc-based products. If you used the original talc-based formula for years or decades, your past exposure is the basis for any legal claim.
What is the LTL Management bankruptcy strategy?
Johnson & Johnson created a subsidiary called LTL Management and transferred its talc-related liabilities to that entity, which then filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. This strategy (known as the "Texas Two-Step") was intended to resolve all talc claims through a single bankruptcy settlement rather than thousands of individual trials. The first attempt was dismissed by courts, but J&J filed again with the $8.9 billion settlement proposal, which requires approval from claimants and the bankruptcy court.
Can men file talcum powder lawsuits?
While the majority of claims involve ovarian cancer in women, men who developed mesothelioma after regular use of talc-based body powder may also be eligible to file claims. Mesothelioma claims are based on the allegation that talc products were contaminated with asbestos fibers. Men who were exposed to talc through occupational use (mining, manufacturing) may also qualify. For more information on asbestos-related claims, see the asbestos/mesothelioma lawsuit page.

Legal Disclaimer

This is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. It does not create an attorney-client relationship. The information presented may not reflect the most current legal developments. Consult a qualified attorney in your jurisdiction for advice about your specific situation.

Free Case Review — See If You Qualify

No obligation. No upfront costs. Attorneys work on contingency — you pay nothing unless you win.

Related Lawsuits